This video left me with more questions than areas of interest. It is definitely significant how a film rating scheme has almost greater confidentiality than a federal courtroom. They are just movies. We're not talking about the Sadam Hussein trial. It's funny that all these so called raters receive no training whatsoever on their duties. The fact that Jack Valenti worked in Washington alone says corruption. Why does Hollywood need secrets when it is an industry that is intended to express rather than compartmentalize? It appears that the rating board is not diversified. How messed up is it that American Psycho got an NC-17 rating yet the movie had a sequel? In the entire showing of the soldiers in Iraq, only one white soldier was shown. What does that say, exactly about how much this might be an just an attempt to win over viewers? Really? An episcopalian and a Catholic Priest? What does that say about how deep the Vatican is all things? Seriously what happened to the separation of church and state? On wait, it's not a federal court, yet it has more confidentiality. After all the appeals court is treated like a legal courtroom that takes full advantage of the fat that it is not. Seriously, they wouldn't even give the guy the names of his "jurors." Isn't that constitutional right? Violence(people dying and being slaughtered) is ok but sex(the act if giving life) is bad. What does that say about the separation of sub-cultures. It's easy, conflict brings commerce.